Rechercher dans ce blog

Wednesday, June 30, 2021

House Opens Jan. 6 Investigation Over Republican Opposition - The New York Times

With all but two Republicans voting no, the House created a select committee, controlled by Democrats, to scrutinize the security failures and root causes that contributed to the Capitol riot.

WASHINGTON — The House voted mostly along party lines on Wednesday to create a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, pushing ahead over near-unanimous Republican opposition with a broad inquiry controlled by Democrats into the deadliest attack on Congress in centuries.

The panel, established at the behest of Speaker Nancy Pelosi after Senate Republicans blocked the formation of a bipartisan independent commission to scrutinize the assault, will investigate what its organizing resolution calls “the facts, circumstances and causes relating to the Jan. 6, 2021, domestic terrorist attack.”

The 13-member panel, which has subpoena power, will have eight members named by the majority party and five with input from Republicans, and is meant to examine President Donald J. Trump’s role in inspiring the riot. While the measure creating it does not mention him, it charges the committee with looking at the law enforcement and government response to the storming of the Capitol and “the influencing factors that fomented such an attack on American representative democracy while engaged in a constitutional process.”

It passed by a vote of 222 to 190, with only two Republicans joining Democrats to support it.

“We have a duty to the Constitution and to the American people to find the truth of Jan. 6 and to ensure that such an assault on our democracy can never happen again,” Ms. Pelosi said, calling Jan. 6 “one of the darkest days of our history.”

“The sheer scale of the violence of that day is shocking,” she added. “But what is just as shocking is remembering why this violence occurred: to block the certification of an election and the peaceful transfer of power that is the cornerstone of our democracy.”

Several officers who responded to the riot that day were on hand to watch the vote from Ms. Pelosi’s box in the House gallery. They included Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police and two District of Columbia police officers, Michael Fanone, who has lobbied Republicans to support an investigation, and Daniel Hodges, who was crushed in a door during the rampage. Relatives of Brian D. Sicknick, a Capitol Police officer who died after clashing with the rioters, joined them.

While the measure says that five members of the panel are to be named “after consultation with the minority leader,” Representative Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, he has not said whether he will recommend anyone. Last week, he told Mr. Fanone and Mr. Dunn in a private meeting that he would take the appointment process seriously, even as he declined to publicly denounce members of his party who have sought to downplay or spread lies about the riot.

Ms. Pelosi is considering picking a Republican who has acknowledged the gravity of the attack for one of her eight slots, according to an aide. But her options are exceedingly slim.

Shortly after the breach, many Republicans expressed outrage and vowed to hold the perpetrators accountable. But their support for an investigation has eroded steadily in the months since, and all but evaporated after Mr. Trump issued a statement in May calling the idea of an independent inquiry a “Democrat trap.”

Many have speculated that Ms. Pelosi might select Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, who was removed from her House leadership post after she pushed Republicans to hold themselves and Mr. Trump responsible for fomenting the riot with the lie that the 2020 election had been stolen.

Ms. Cheney, one of only 35 House Republicans who voted to create the independent commission, which was to be modeled after the one that investigated the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, also broke with her party on Wednesday to vote in favor of forming the panel.

“I believe this select committee is our only remaining option,” she said in a statement. “The committee should issue and enforce subpoenas promptly, hire skilled counsel, and do its job thoroughly and expeditiously.”

Ms. Pelosi, center, embracing officers who responded to the riot, including Harry Dunn, right, of the Capitol Police, and Michael Fanone, left, of the District of Columbia police. 
Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times

Only one other Republican, Representative Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, an outspoken critic of Mr. Trump, supported the move.

Few Republicans spoke during the debate and about two dozen missed the vote altogether to fly to the southern border to attend an event with Mr. Trump, who praised some of them by name.

But whether in person or remotely, the party lined up in opposition to the panel, which their leaders insisted would be a one-sided forum for Democrats to censure Mr. Trump and try to kneecap Republicans in the 2022 elections.

Representative Michelle Fischbach, Republican of Minnesota, argued that the committee would duplicate existing investigations and engage in “partisan, divisive politics.”

“We gave you bipartisan,” Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts, responded, referring to the proposed independent inquiry, which would have had an equal number of Democrat- and Republican-appointed members. “Give me a break. This is clear: They don’t want to get to the truth.”

In particular, the select committee is charged with investigating failures in law enforcement, such as intelligence gathering, and the root causes that influenced so many to turn violent, scrutinizing online platforms and any potential “malign foreign influence operations.”

During the debate on Wednesday, several Democrats spoke of the emotional toll Jan. 6 had taken on them. Representative Jackie Speier, Democrat of California — who was shot in 1978 on a remote airstrip in Guyana during the Jonestown massacre, which killed her boss at the time, Representative Leo J. Ryan, Democrat of California, and four others — recalled being trapped in the House chamber and hearing a gunshot outside.

“My heart is racing right now and I’m trembling,” she said, thinking back on Jan. 6. “I thought at that moment, ‘My God, I survived Guyana. But I’m not going to survive this in the house of democracy.’ ”

Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Democrat of New York and chairwoman of the Oversight and Reform Committee, called the riot, which unfolded as Congress officially tallied electoral votes to formalize President Biden’s victory, “one of the most shattering times of my life — to see the work of our government violated and stopped by an insurrection.”

“I don’t know what would have happened if they had captured the vice president,” Ms. Maloney said, referring the mob’s threats to hang Mike Pence, for whom they built a gallows outside the Capitol. “His life would have been in danger, no question.”

Nearly 140 police officers were injured in the attack and at least seven people died in connection with it, including two officers who were on duty on Jan. 6 and later took their own lives.

Several investigations into the assault are already underway, but none have a mandate to look comprehensively at the event similar to the fact-finding commissions that scrutinized Sept. 11, the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941 and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963.

The F.B.I. has arrested nearly 500 people involved in the Jan. 6 breach, and is pursuing potentially hundreds more, the agency’s director told Congress. Several congressional committees are conducting their own investigations, including two Senate panels that outlined large-scale failures that contributed to the assault. And several inspectors general have begun their own inquiries, finding lapses and miscalculations around the most violent attack on the Capitol since the War of 1812.

The select committee is similar in design to the panel the Republican-controlled House formed in 2014 to investigate an attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, which Democrats denounced as intended to damage the presidential prospects of Hillary Clinton, who had been secretary of state at the time. It ultimately became one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history.

That panel was made up of seven Republicans and five Democrats.

Adblock test (Why?)


House Opens Jan. 6 Investigation Over Republican Opposition - The New York Times
Read More

Rise in online payments spurs questions over cybersecurity and privacy - CNBC

Mastercard

As more and more consumers embrace new methods of payment on e-commerce sites, questions over cybersecurity have become even more critical for businesses.

In a Mastercard survey on new payments, conducted across 18 markets globally, a majority of consumers polled said they were willing to consider emerging payment methods such as digital or mobile wallets, QR codes and even cryptocurrencies. 

"Ninety percent of the consumers have tried at least one emerging payment type in the last year. And out of those, two thirds of them have actually done it for the first time" — and would not have done it had it not been for the pandemic, said Sandeep Malhotra, executive vice president of products and innovation, Asia Pacific at Mastercard.

"And 60% of the consumers would like to shy away from the merchants who do not offer electronic payments of any kind," he told CNBC.

Threats over cyber security have become a growing concern as more people turn to online payments. This was borne out in the Mastercard survey, which revealed a troubling rise in online fraud cases as a result of lockdowns during the pandemic.

"One out of four consumers have experienced some kind of a fraud last year. There was a good 49% increase in cybercrime last year, just because everybody was staying home," noted Malhotra.

I think at the end of the day, the government has to tread quite a fine balance between the consumer needs, and also the industry or the business needs.
Selena Ling
chief economist, OCBC

As a result, Mastercard has taken a number of measures to build consumer confidence when using its credit cards for online payments. 

"What we are doing in that space is basically creating safe and secure solutions, and offering that comfort to the customer. Whether it's using biometrics, whether it's using different kinds of verification methods, which are beyond pins, which are beyond passwords," said Malhotra.

"That is the assurance the consumer is looking for," he added.

Protecting consumers' privacy

Similarly, in Singapore, the pandemic has led to a rise in cybercrimes.

E-commerce fraud had the highest reported cases in the first half of last year. The number of scams increased by 73.8% to 2,089 in the first half of 2020 — up from 1,202 in the same period in 2019, according to local police. This was partly due to the rise in online transactions during the pandemic, they said.

Singapore is among the countries in the world with the highest penetration of contactless payment, said Anthony Seow, managing director and head of payments and platforms, at DBS bank. "I think globally, number one is probably Australia, we're probably number two," he added.

DBS is currently using the latest technology to root out online scams, said Seow.

"We actually use industry leading solutions to scan transactions," he explained. "There's AI (artificial intelligence), there's algorithm... we are able to suss out suspicious transactions and block it before it hits the consumers."

To further enhance consumer privacy, Singapore made changes to its personal data protection act.

Under the new amendments that came into effect this year, companies will face stiffer penalties for data breaches, but will get more freedom to use personal data for innovation purposes.  

Private health-care training provider HMI Institute of Health Sciences, was recently fined a hefty $26,000 (or 35,000 Singapore dollars) for failing to provide adequate security arrangements to protect personal data stored in its server. The data breach affected more than 110,000 people, according to local media.

"Singapore actually has quite a good data privacy protection law," said Selena Ling, chief economist at OCBC bank in Singapore. "I think at the end of the day, you know, the government has to tread quite a fine balance between the consumer needs, and also the industry or the business needs."

"I think for the consumers, they also have to be aware what their information is being used for. And I think there is greater awareness now, of course, with the data protection act, about what kind of information that they should give to firms that are collecting those data," she added.       

Adblock test (Why?)


Rise in online payments spurs questions over cybersecurity and privacy - CNBC
Read More

Bill Cosby accusers and their attorneys express outrage and betrayal over his release from prison - CNN

Cosby was released after Pennsylvania's highest court overturned his sexual assault conviction, saying his due process rights were violated in the first major case of the #MeToo era.
The reaction from accusers and their attorneys to Wednesday's announcement is in stark contrast to the elation many of them felt in 2018 when the comedian was found guilty of three counts of aggravated indecent assault for drugging and sexually assaulting Andrea Constand at his home in a Philadelphia suburb in 2004.
Here's what the women, along with their attorneys, had to say:

Andrea Constand

Andrea Constand
Constand was the central figure in Cosby's criminal trial three years ago. She testified that Cosby drugged and assaulted her at his home in 2004.
Constand and her attorneys said Wednesday's decision to vacate Cosby's conviction is disappointing and discouraging to survivors of sexual assault.
"Today's majority decision regarding Bill Cosby is not only disappointing but of concern in that it may discourage those who seek justice for sexual assault in the criminal justice system from reporting or participating in the prosecution of the assailant or may force a victim to choose between filing either a criminal or civil action."

Victoria Valentino

Victoria Valentino
Victoria Valentino accused Cosby of raping her in the 1960s.
"I am outraged! Outraged! Stunned! My stomach is in knots. The work that we have done to uplift women has been overturned by a legal glitch. We now have a serial predator on the street," she said.
Valentino said the announcement came out of left field and she described it as a gut punch.
"What does that say about a woman's worth? A woman's value? Do our lives mean nothing? All of the lives that he damaged, not to mention our children and how we respond to our children and our personal relationships. He's impacted the lives of well over 60 women."
Valentino went on to say that when Cosby's guilty verdict came three years ago, she and other accusers -- as well as victims of other powerful men, such as Harvey Weinstein -- felt vindicated.
"So here we are, back to square one," she said.

Janice Baker-Kinney

Janice Baker-Kinney
Janice Baker-Kinney accused Cosby of giving her pills and raping her in the 1980s.
She told CNN affiliate WPVI-TV it's taking her some time to absorb news of Cosby's release.
"I am stunned, I am shocked and my stomach is in a knot, ... One legal ease can overturn this when so many people came forward. ... This serial rapist gets to go home today is just stunning to me," she said.

Lisa Bloom, attorney for Cosby accusers

Lisa Bloom
Lisa Bloom told CNN's Ana Cabrera she is "disgusted and shocked" by the ruling.
"The jury heard all of the evidence, considered everything, convicted him, and now that this day has come I just think it's a slap in the face for all the victims," said Bloom, one of the attorneys.
"I'm glad he got some time served," she said, but it was only "a tiny, tiny measure of the justice that he should have received."
Bloom said she thought Wednesday was "going to be a very hard day. I think it's going to be a retriggering event for all of them who've testified that he had drugged and raped them."
She also tweeted and told CNN that Cosby's release shows the criminal justice system favors the rich and powerful.
"And it just goes to show, if you have money and power in the criminal justice system and you can afford attorneys to fight and fight for years and years, eventually you may find a loophole and a way to get a conviction overturned, and that's what's happened here," Bloom said.

Gloria Allred, attorney for Cosby accusers

Gloria Allred
In a statement obtained by CNN, attorney Gloria Allred said the following:
"This decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court today to overturn the conviction of Bill Cosby must be devastating for Bill Cosby's accusers. My heart especially goes out to those who bravely testified in both of his criminal cases. I represented a majority of the prior bad act accusers who testified. Despite the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision, this was an important fight for justice and even though the court overturned the conviction on technical grounds, it did not vindicate Bill Cosby's conduct and should not be interpreted as a statement or a finding that he did not engage in the acts of which he has been accused."

Adblock test (Why?)


Bill Cosby accusers and their attorneys express outrage and betrayal over his release from prison - CNN
Read More

Robinhood is fined $70 million over misleading customers and system outages. - The New York Times

Robinhood Financial, the online stock-trading app, was fined $70 million by the securities industry’s self-regulator on Wednesday for a series of failures that the agency said hurt Robinhood’s customers.

The announcement came ahead of Robinhood filing an investment prospectus to go public, which is likely to land later this week, a person with knowledge of the matter said. The company’s initial public offering is expected to be one of the highest profile of the year.

The fine, the largest ever imposed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which is known as FINRA, was the latest legal punishment for Robinhood. The eight-year-old start-up has upended the online brokerage business by introducing fee-free trading and gained prominence this year as the venue of choice for much of the stock-trading mania that boosted shares in companies like GameStop and AMC Entertainment.

The Silicon Valley company has repeatedly been accused of operational and regulatory lapses by regulators and lawmakers that, critics said, left customers exposed to sometimes ruinous losses. Robinhood has already paid tens of millions of dollars in fines, including $65 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission, for misleading customers about its business.

In its announcement on Wednesday, FINRA said that the fine covered issues like false and misleading information and the harm suffered by customers from systems outages in March 2020. The regulator said Robinhood must follow rules that were designed to protect investors and the markets.

“Compliance with these rules is not optional and cannot be sacrificed for the sake of innovation or a willingness to ‘break things’ and fix them later,” Jessica Hopper, the head of FINRA’s enforcement department, said in a statement.

Jacqueline Ortiz Ramsay, a spokeswoman for Robinhood, said in a statement, “We are glad to put this matter behind us and look forward to continuing to focus on our customers and democratizing finance for all.”

Robinhood, which was founded by Vlad Tenev and Baiju Bhatt, has long had a mission of democratizing finance. It grew by attracting investors — especially younger ones — with its no-fee trading. But the company has faced questions about whether it encouraged overly risky trading with its lack of fees and features such as behavioral nudges and push notifications that critics said created a gambling-like atmosphere.

Baiju Bhatt, left, and Vlad Tenev, the founders of Robinhood, in 2016. 
Aaron Wojack for The New York Times

Last year, a 31-year-old customer died by suicide after discovering a negative $730,000 balance in his Robinhood account, a figure that was somewhat inflated because of incomplete trades.

In recent months, prominent investors have also criticized Robinhood and its practices. This week, Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway called for stronger regulation of the app on CNBC, with Mr. Munger calling Robinhood “a gambling parlor masquerading as a respectable business.”

In its announcement of the fine on Wednesday, FINRA said Robinhood had given customers wrong information about how to trade on margin, or with borrowed money. The company also failed to closely scrutinize some customers who were approved to trade in stock options, despite red flags suggesting they were not suited for that kind of high-risk trading, the regulator said.

FINRA also faulted Robinhood for system outages between 2018 and 2020 that locked customers out of their accounts during huge market swings, saddling some traders with thousands of dollars in losses. And the regulator announced a $30 million education initiative for new investors.

The penalty may help lift regulatory uncertainty that had weighed on Robinhood’s plans to go public. The company, which is privately valued at nearly $12 billion, has been expected to officially publish its I.P.O. prospectus for several months.

In a blog post, Robinhood outlined expansions it has made to support investors, including adding customer support employees and a hotline. The company did not have a phone number for customers to call with issues or questions in its early years, which has drawn criticism.

Robinhood also highlighted improvements it has made to help avoid outages, as well as “more rigorous criteria” for risky options trading that it began applying in September.

It still faces other legal challenges, including a lawsuit by the top securities regulator in Massachusetts that seeks to bar the company from operating there. The state’s securities regulator has claimed that Robinhood uses “aggressive tactics” and “gamification” to attract inexperienced investors to trade on its platform. The S.E.C. is separately continuing a review of January’s “meme stock” rally.

At the time, Robinhood halted trades on certain stocks, which enraged customers and prompted nearly 50 customer lawsuits.

Robinhood has raised billions of dollars in funding from investors such as Sequoia Capital and New Enterprise Associates. During the meme stock rally, it raised $1 billion and then another $2.4 billion in quick succession after it was strained by the high volume of trading through its app.

In a February congressional hearing about the meme stock rally, in which Robinhood was cast as the villain, Mr. Tenev took an apologetic tone.

“I’m not going to say that Robinhood did everything perfect,” he said.

Matthew Goldstein contributed reporting.

Adblock test (Why?)


Robinhood is fined $70 million over misleading customers and system outages. - The New York Times
Read More

Australian Officials Split Over AstraZeneca Vaccine Advice - The New York Times

A rift has emerged between Australia’s federal government, state leaders and medical groups over vaccination advice, with several officials issuing public objections to Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s decision to make the AstraZeneca vaccine available to those under 40.

Australia’s vaccine advisory body has recommended that people under 60 should be vaccinated with the Pfizer shot because the AstraZeneca vaccine is associated with a very small risk of a serious blood-clotting disorder. But the country’s vaccination campaign was initially planned around AstraZeneca, and supplies of other shots are so far relatively constrained, with Pfizer appointments not yet open to most people under 40.

Less than 5 percent of Australians are fully vaccinated, and just under a quarter have had one dose of a vaccine. Parts of four states or territories, including four major cities, are in lockdown to halt outbreaks associated with the Delta variant, and there are restrictions in two more.

In response to outbreaks of the more infectious Delta variant of the virus, Mr. Morrison announced on Monday that the federal government would allow family doctors to administer the AstraZeneca vaccine to those under 40 who wanted it.

“If you wish to get the AstraZeneca vaccine, then we would encourage you to go and have that discussion” with your doctor, he said.

But soon after, state leaders spoke against the decision. “I do not want under-40s to get AstraZeneca,” Queensland’s chief health officer, Dr. Jeannette Young, said at a news conference on Wednesday. “I don’t want an 18-year-old in Queensland dying from a clotting illness who, if they got Covid, probably wouldn’t die.”

Parts of Queensland recently entered a three-day lockdown as authorities race to contain an outbreak.

The premier of Western Australia, Mark McGowan, echoed Dr. Young’s position and called for people over 60 to be given the Pfizer vaccine to combat vaccine hesitancy.

Dr. Omar Khorshid, president of the Australian Medical Association, which represents doctors and medical students, said the announcement “was a surprise.” While some medical clinics have started providing consultations to younger people wanting to get the AstraZeneca vaccine, some doctors have said they want more information before they would be comfortable doing so.

Adblock test (Why?)


Australian Officials Split Over AstraZeneca Vaccine Advice - The New York Times
Read More

‘It Taunts the Eye’: Footwork’s Fast Moves Loom Over Chicago - The New York Times

Projected onto the Merchandise Mart, “Footnotes” honors a style that’s become popular around the world but isn’t always given recognition in its hometown.

Footwork, the Chicago-born music-and-dance form, is famous for its speed. D.J.s deliver a tense, polyrhythmic mix of stuttering samples at the jacked-up rate of 160 beats per minute, and dancers meet the challenge with an onslaught of swivels, kicks and scissoring steps even more bewilderingly quick and intricate than the music.

This summer, that speed is finding a match in size. From Tuesday through Sept. 16, “Footnotes,” a short footwork film, is being projected across the 2.5-acre facade of the Merchandise Mart, a behemoth of a building covering two blocks of downtown Chicago. That’s a screen the size of about two football fields. Each night, the incredibly fast dance grows incredibly large.

It’s a boost in visibility for a style, developed by Black youth, that hasn’t always been welcome in the city’s center — a style that has become popular around the world but isn’t always given recognition and respect in its hometown.

“It’s about damn time,” said the footwork dancer Jamal Oliver, better known as Litebulb. “Footwork has been part of Chicago for 30 years.”

Litebulb, in “In the Wurkz,” a touring show by the Era Footwork Crew.
Wills Glasspiegel

Litebulb, 31, who dances in the film and helped produce it, said that while appearing on the side of a building is exciting, “what’s more fulfilling is giving that opportunity to kids who would never get that chance.” Paying it forward is part of the mission of the Era Footwork Crew, a collective Litebulb helped found in 2014, and of its offshoot nonprofit organization, Open the Circle.

In footwork parlance, “opening the circle” means making a space for dancing when the floor is too packed. Open the Circle seeks to do something similar in the field of social justice, not just making spaces for dancing and dancers but also spreading knowledge through education and funneling resources like grant money into the communities that created footwork.

“When most people create these kinds of organizations, they’ve already made a fortune and now they want to give back,” Litebulb said. “But we’re doing it from the grass roots.”

By design, the work of the Era and Open the Circle blurs in footwork projects, including public “dance downs,” a summer camp (Circle Up), videos, rap singles, a touring show (“In the Wurkz”) and a feature-length documentary on the way (“Body of the City”). The collectives extend footwork into the world of art galleries, universities and music festivals without losing touch with where it came from.

Jason Pinkney
Jason Pinkney

“Footnotes” is an extension of these efforts, both an advertisement and an upshot. “We’ve been doing a lot of work with the City of Chicago,” said Wills Glasspiegel, the documentary filmmaker and scholar who made the film with the Era dancer and animator Brandon Calhoun. “The city has recognized us as a good partner.” (Glasspiegel and Litebulb are both founders of the Era and executive directors of Open the Circle.)

In this case, the Department of Cultural Affairs and Special Events reached out about its “Year of Chicago Music” project and a partnership with Art on theMart, which has been projecting public art on the building since 2018.

Glasspiegel jumped at the chance. “Footwork is emblematic of our city,” he said, “so we tried to make the film as Chicago as possible, expressing the city as we Chicagoans experience it.” The filmmakers brought in musicians with deep local roots: Angel Bat Dawid; Amal Hubert of Hypnotic Brass Ensemble; and the Chicago Bucket Boys, who, Glasspiegel said, “are the sound of Chicago’s streets.” Elisha Chandler, a dancer with “In the Wurkz,” sings.

But if the film’s musicians connect footwork to the city, its method of composition connects the musicians to footwork. To create the soundtrack, the Bucket Boys improvised at 160 beats per minute, then the others laid down improvisations in response, riffing on the blues song “Sweet Home, Chicago.” DJ Spinn, a seminal figure in the genre, took all those pieces and treated them as samples, turning them into footwork.

Using the music as a map, Glasspiegel edited together footage of the musicians with footage of dancers. The contribution of Calhoun, also known as Chief Manny, was crucial, too: transforming some of that footage into animation. It makes the dancing more legible.

Wills Glasspiegel and Brandon K. Calhoun

That’s particularly important for “Footnotes,” since the Merchandise Mart presents a challenging surface for projection — the facade is perforated with hundreds of windows that may or may not be lighted. But the animation is useful in conveying footwork more generally. “Footwork moves so fast, it taunts the eye,” Glasspiegel said. Calhoun — with his dancer’s inside knowledge — clarifies its phrasing and shape.

At one point in the film, an animated DJ Spinn taps an MPC, the sampling device that is the main instrument of footwork music, and an animated dancer bounces on the keys. This image is important, Glasspiegel said, because it’s a metaphor. “That’s a driving theme for us — that footwork is both music and dance — which people might not know if they don’t know the history.”

Footwork developed in the late 1980s and early ’90s in dance clubs, community centers and roller-rink discos that played house music. Another important site was the Bud Billiken parade, one of the largest African American parades in the country and one of the oldest, happening every summer since 1929. In these places, foundational footwork moves, like the Holy Ghost (a slack-limbed shaking) and the Erk n Jerk (a sequence of seesawing, sideways kicks), emerged before footwork got its name.

Some of the top dance crews of those days — Main Attraction, House-O-Matics, U-Phi-U — included dancers who became D.J.s, most importantly RP Boo and DJ Rashad. And it was these dancers-turned-D.J.s who created the footwork sound, increasing the tempo and stripping things down to ratchet up the tension (or throw off rival dancers) in dance battles — intense, improvisational face-offs that became the core of footwork culture in the early 2000s. Overlapping rhythms gave dancers more options, and competition pushed innovation.

As had happened before with hip-hop — when M.C.s, who made money for the music industry, eclipsed b-boys, who didn’t — the music spread without the dance, especially abroad. “People didn’t really see the dance until DJ Rashad and DJ Spinn brought dancers on tour with them in 2010,” Litebulb said.

Wills Glasspiegel

Litebulb was one of those dancers, discovering rapturous fans in Europe but finding less recognition back home. “Too often dancers are viewed as background or bodies, not artists,” he said. “It’s important to have the balance, celebrating what the DJs are doing and what the dancers are doing.”

“Footnotes” does that, but it also shows other ways that the Era and Open the Circle have been influencing the footwork scene. When footwork moved from clubs, parades and dance groups into more insular battles, women got pushed out. The Era and Open the Circle have been inviting them back in.

“In battling culture, women were expected to stand on the side and look cute,” said Diamond Hardiman, a 27-year-old dancer who appears in the film. “You couldn’t get in the circle.”

Women of her generation began battling one another. “It was empowering, seeing what we could do with each other to make ourselves better and letting the guys know that us women can do the same thing that y’all doing.”

Jason Pinkney

Women like Hardiman made space for themselves, but Open the Circle has also helped by reconnecting footwork with the youth dance groups in which it began. These groups are filled with girls and often run by women. (Women in the family of Shkunna Stewart, who directs the group Bringing Out Talent, have been running groups for four generations.)

Members of such groups are the core population of Open the Circle’s summer camps on the South and East Sides of Chicago, camps where women like Hardiman teach. Some of these children appear in “Footnotes.” A girl called Ladybug leaps like a grasshopper, a dozen stories tall.

The goal of the camps is broader than correcting the gender imbalance, though. “In our community, footwork is kind of viewed as nostalgia, but if we can get the kids, then footwork can live on,” Litebulb said. “It will be a whole new evolution than what we thought it was.”

And it’s about more than perpetuating a style. As some of the camp T-shirts attest, “Footwork saves lives.”

“It really did save my life,” Hardiman said, echoing the sentiment of other Era members. “I grew up seeing the stuff I wasn’t supposed to see at a young age, but footwork showed me I didn’t have to do those things.”

“I don’t want my child to go through what I had to go through,” she added.

That aspiration can be felt in the film as well. “The big kicker for me is showing the kids anything’s possible,” Litebulb said. “Look at yourself on the side of a building now. Who would have thought?”

Adblock test (Why?)


‘It Taunts the Eye’: Footwork’s Fast Moves Loom Over Chicago - The New York Times
Read More

Club for Growth raises over $5 million to support Budd - North State Journal

Rep. Ted Budd at his family farm in Davie County. Courtesy photo

RALEIGH — The conservative group Club for Growth Action, the fundraising arm of the influential Club for Growth, announced last week it has raised $5.1 million to support U.S. Rep. Ted Budd’s campaign for U.S. Senate.

In a statement, Club for Growth Action President David McIntosh said, “Ted Budd is a true champion of pro-growth policies and we are proud to support his Senate campaign. We have already raised over $5 million for the race, and we plan to raise and spend even more.”

Budd has a 97% lifetime rating on Club for Growth Foundation’s Economic Scorecard, according to the organization.

The announcement is among the first tangible results of Budd’s string of endorsements since he entered the race in April.

U.S. Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC09) endorsed Budd soon after his announcement, which was followed by the Senate Conservatives Fund and former President Donald Trump.

Also last week, U.S. Rep. Brian Mast of Florida endorsed Budd, saying, “Ted knows that leadership is about service and sacrifice, not the perks of office. I’m proud to join President Trump in endorsing proven conservative leader Ted Budd for Senate.”

Adblock test (Why?)


Club for Growth raises over $5 million to support Budd - North State Journal
Read More

Fox News Pays Record Fine Over #MeToo Violations of NYC Human Rights Law - NPR

Outside the Fox News headquarters building in New York City. Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images

Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images

Fox News Media has agreed to pay a record $1 million fine as part of a broader settlement following an investigation by the New York City Commission on Human Rights into patterns of sexual harassment and retribution at the cable news channel.

For Fox News, the financial penalty is symbolic, as it is believed to make more than $2 billion a year in profits. Yet the figure marks the maximum the commission could levy in the case. The settlement was first reported by the Daily Beast's Lloyd Grove.

The conditions of the settlement are more consequential: along with specifying training programs and ways for employees to report harassment, Fox News agreed not to issue any new or extended contracts that compel people to resolve disputes in binding and confidential arbitration for the next four years.

That has been a key objection of many women who sued Fox News or accused influential men at the network of harassment. And it means that people will be able to publicly accuse Fox or its employees of violating New York City human rights law in state or federal courts, rather than being shepherded into closed arbitration hearings. Fox cannot compel other employees who don't have such individual contracts into private proceedings, according to two people with knowledge of the settlement.

"We found that [Fox News] engaged in a pattern and practice of retaliating against the individuals that were working at Fox News," Christina Piaia, supervising attorney of the commission's gender-based harassment unit, tells NPR. "When such information was reported, oftentimes there was additional retaliation that happened."

"We hope that this is a model for other conciliation agreements and other agencies and other companies to start that, by not allowing mandatory arbitration clauses to be in any of these contracts," Piaia says.

The commission's investigation stemmed from revelations of systemic sexual harassment by Fox News's former chairman, the late Roger Ailes. Former Fox President Bill Shine was accused of enabling Ailes' repeated harassment with payoffs, promises and threats. Each denied the accusations. Yet each would lose their jobs. So did others as more accusations poured forth against other senior men at the network, including former Fox hosts Bill O'Reilly, Eric Bolling and Ed Henry, executive Francisco Cortes, and reporter James Rosen, among others. (All but Rosen denied the allegations against them; Rosen declined to comment.)

A commission spokesperson says the settlement covers mandatory arbitration clauses in any newly signed or extended contract for four years, starting late next month.

"If that's true, it's a big deal," says lawyer Douglas Wigdor, who has sued Fox on behalf of 20 clients in recent years but played no role in the commission's investigation. "It would be a very bold and big move." He credited Fox as well as the city for reaching such an agreement.

"It's a beautiful statement about mandatory arbitration," says attorney Nancy Erika Smith, who represented former Fox News host Gretchen Carlson, former reporter Diana Falzone (who now writes for The Daily Beast), and former commentator Julie Roginsky, in their allegations of harassment. "Arbitration does enable harassment and discrimination by silencing victims. Bravo NYC!"

Fox News presented the settlement as the residue of an earlier and unsavory age, the resolutions already in place.

"We are pleased to reach an amicable resolution of this legacy matter," read a statement conveyed by a spokesperson for the network. "FOX News Media has already been in full compliance across the board, but cooperated with the New York City Commission on Human Rights to continue enacting extensive preventive measures against all forms of discrimination and harassment."

Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott has said she has sought to remake the culture at the network, blowing up the old newsroom literally and figuratively. Women hold more top jobs than ever before; human resources division is under new leadership and its staffing levels have swelled; new policies throughout the network dictate appropriate behavior and training and enhance multiple ways to file complaints. Scott cited strict anti-harassment policies in a memo to staff last July about firing Henry. A former colleague had alleged he had physically abused her. Scott made clear such behavior was unacceptable.

The shield that arbitration offers to employers and those accused of wrongdoing played a large role in the Fox News scandal. On Carlson's behalf, Smith sidestepped arbitration by suing Ailes individually instead of Fox News so she could get Ailes' taped harassment of the former Fox host into the public record. Carlson eventually won a $20 million private payment from Fox and initiated the cascade of allegations that led to Ailes' downfall. Fox Corp paid Ailes $40 million as he left the network, just days after Carlson's suit was filed.

"It's major that a government agency has finally publicly acknowledged that mandatory arbitration enables harassment and discrimination as it silences victims," Smith says. "And it's a tool that takes away very important rights that are embodied in the Constitution.... It's disgusting how it's used to silence victims."

In some ways, the settlement serves as a Rorschach test for Scott's tenure. She started out in the network's first year as a junior assistant to one of Ailes' closest friends and top executives. Over the next quarter century, she rose through the ranks to be Shine's deputy and then led Fox News after a stretch in which founder and controlling owner Rupert Murdoch ran the network. Since taking over, Scott has presented herself as a reformer. She also touted the network's certification as a "Great Place To Work."

By contrast, Roginsky alleged in her lawsuit that Scott was complicit in efforts to silence her accusations of harassment against Ailes and retaliation by Shine. Scott denied the claim; Roginsky ultimately reached a financial settlement with Fox News. It is believed that Fox News, its corporate owners, its insurers and O'Reilly personally have together paid out more than $200 million to resolve harassment cases and to oust some of those accused.

"In case after case after case, she forced victims into mandatory arbitration," Smith, the attorney, says of Scott. "She forced them into settlements with non-disclosure agreements. We've written to her and asked her... to release women of their non-disclosure agreements."

"If she has done such a great job, why is she silencing women?"

Fox News officials have called such criticism unfair to Scott, blaming her for the actions and decisions of others. "FOX News Media has worked tirelessly to completely change the company culture over the last five years," a second statement from the network stated. It hailed Scott's leadership and cited a "zero tolerance" for workplace misconduct.

For the next four years, Fox journalists under new contracts will not have to go through the confidential process to resolve conflicts.

Adblock test (Why?)


Fox News Pays Record Fine Over #MeToo Violations of NYC Human Rights Law - NPR
Read More

California, West Virginia AGs exchange words over law - The Inter-Mountain

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

California, West Virginia AGs exchange words over law  The Inter-Mountain
California, West Virginia AGs exchange words over law - The Inter-Mountain
Read More

Google tightens UK policy on financial ads after watchdog pressure over scams - TechCrunch

The UK’s more expansive, post-Brexit role in digital regulation continues to be felt today via a policy change by Google which has announced that it will, in the near future, only run ads for financial products and services when the advertiser in question has been verified by the financial watchdog, the FCA.

The Google Ads Financial Products and Services policy will be updated from August 30, per Google, which specifies that it will start enforcing the new policy from September 6 — meaning that purveyors of online financial scams who’ve been relying on its ad network to net their next victim still have more than two months to harvest unsuspecting clicks before the party is over (well, in the UK, anyway).

Google’s decision to allow only regulator authorized financial entities to run ads for financial products & services follows warnings from the Financial Conduct Authority that it may take legal action if Google continued to accept unscreened financial ads, as the Guardian reported earlier.

The FCA told a parliamentary committee this month that it’s able to contemplate taking such action as a result of no longer being bound by European Union rules on financial adverts, which do not extend to online platforms, per the newspaper’s report.

Until gaining the power to go after Google itself, the FCA appears to have been trying to combat the scourge of online financial fraud by paying Google large amounts of UK taxpayer money to fight scams with anti-scam warnings.

According to the Register, the FCA paid Google more than £600,000 (~$830k) in 2020 and 2021 to run ‘anti-scam’ ads — with the regulator essentially engaged in a bidding war with scammers to pour enough money into Google’s coffers so that regulator warnings about financial scams might appear higher than the scams themselves.

The full-facepalm situation was presumably highly lucrative for Google. But the threat of legal action appears to have triggered a policy rethink.

Writing in its blog post, Ronan Harris, a VP and MD for Google UK & Ireland, said: “Financial services advertisers will be required to demonstrate that they are authorised by the UK Financial Conduct Authority or qualify for one of the limited exemptions described in the UK Financial Services verification page.”

“This new update builds on significant work in partnership with the FCA over the last 18 months to help tackle this issue,” he added. “Today’s announcement reflects significant progress in delivering a safer experience for users, publishers and advertisers. While we understand that this policy update will impact a range of advertisers in the financial services space, our utmost priority is to keep users safe on our platforms — particularly in an area so disproportionately targeted by fraudsters.”

The company’s blog also claims that it has pledged $5M in advertising credits to support financial fraud public awareness campaigns in the UK. So not $5M in actual money then.

Per the Register, Google did offer to refund the FCA’s anti-scam ad spend — but, again, with advertising credits.

The UK parliament’s Treasury Committee was keen to know whether the tech giant would be refunding the spend in cash. But the FCA’s director of enforcement and market insight, Mark Steward, was unable to confirm what it would do, according to the Register’s report of the committee hearing.

We’ve reached out to the FCA for comment on Google’s policy change, and with questions about the refund situation, and will update this report with any response.

In recent years the financial watchdog has also been concerned about financial scam ads running on social media platforms.

Back in 2018, legal action by a well-known UK consumer advice personality, Martin Lewis — who filed a defamation suit against Facebook — led the social media giant to add a ‘report scam ad’ button in the market as of July 2019.

However research by consumer group, Which?, earlier this year, suggested that neither Facebook nor Google had entirely purged financial scam ads — even when they’d been reported.

Per the BBC, Which?’s survey found that Google had failed to remove around a third (34%) of the scam adverts reported to it vs Facebook failing to remove well over a fifth (26%).

It’s almost like the incentives for online ad giants to act against lucrative online scam ads simply aren’t pressing enough…

More recently, Lewis has been pushing for scam ads to be included in the scope of the UK’s Online Safety Bill.

The sweeping piece of digital regulation aims to tackle a plethora of so-called ‘online harms’ by focusing on regulating user generated content. However Lewis makes the point that a scammer merely needs to pay an ad platform to promote their fraudulent content for it to escape the scope of the planned rules, telling the Good Morning Britain TV program today that the situation is “ludicrous” and “needs to change”.

It’s certainly a confusing carve-out, as we reported at the time the bill was presented. Nor is it the only confusing component of the planned legislation. However on the financial fraud point the government may believe the FCA has the necessary powers to tackle the problem.

We’ve contacted the Department for Digital, Media, Culture and Sport for comment.

Adblock test (Why?)


Google tightens UK policy on financial ads after watchdog pressure over scams - TechCrunch
Read More

Post 29 opens with 7-2 win over Kingwood | News, Sports, Jobs - The Inter-Mountain

KINGWOOD — Elkins Post 29 and first-year manager Phil Wilson opened the season with a 7-2 win over Kingwood Post 56 on Monday night.

Philip Barbour product and current Alderson Broaddus pitcher Will Knight earned the win, going all seven innings and allowing no earned runs on just two hits, striking out 11 and walking two.

Post 56 pushed both of its runs across in the second inning, taking advantage of a pair of Elkins errors and a single from Kyler Grimes to grab a 2-1 lead.

Post 29 responded in the third with a four-run outburst as Nick Hamrick and Cory Reed drew walks and Alex Wilson, Dustyn Primavero and and Knight followed with doubles.

Primavero also had an RBI single in the first.

Elkins tacked on two more runs in the sixth on the strength of singles by Austin Bolyard and Wilson and a Kingwood error.

Primavero and Wilson led Post 29 with two hits each.

Cam Barlow took the loss for Kingwood, giving up five runs on three hits in four innings, striking out three and walking six.

Elkins returns to action at 7 p.m. today at Clarksburg Post 13.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

Adblock test (Why?)


Post 29 opens with 7-2 win over Kingwood | News, Sports, Jobs - The Inter-Mountain
Read More

White Sox's Lucas Giolito trades barbs with Twins' Josh Donaldson over sticky stuff quip - CBS Sports

lucas-giolito-white-sox.jpg
USATSI

White Sox right-hander Lucas Giolito traded verbal barbs with Twins third baseman Josh Donaldson following Chicago's 7-6 win over Minnesota on Tuesday night. 

The drama began after Donaldson hit a two-run homer in the first inning to give the Twins a 2-0 lead; to be more specific, it began after he crossed the plate. At that point, he allegedly shouted to his teammates, "It's not sticky anymore," per Paul Sullivan of the Chicago Tribune. Donaldson's implication, as best as an outsider can tell, was that Giolito's stuff wasn't as good now that he couldn't use foreign substances to improve his grip and his spin rate.

Predictably, Giolito wasn't pleased with Donaldson after the game.

"He's a f------ pest. That's kind of a classless move. If you're going to talk s---, talk s--- to my face. Don't go across home plate and do all that, just come to me," Giolito said, according to James Fegan of The Athletic. "We won. The W's next to my name. They're in last place."

Giolito is correct about this much: the W did indeed go next to his name. He rebounded from a rotten first inning to deliver a quality start: six innings, three earned runs on six hits and a walk. He did strike out only one batter, the lowest tally of the season in a start in which he pitched more than an inning.

Statcast

It's worth noting that Giolito's spin rates were also down from his seasonal average, just as they were in his previous start, which came days after Major League Baseball began to again enforce its own rules on foreign substances. According to Statcast, his fastball was minus-175 rpms; his slider was minus-185 rpms; and so on. Those numbers don't necessarily mean that Giolito was using adhesive substances to improve his pitch quality, but it's understandable if Donaldson drew that conclusion based on the numbers.

Whether or not Giolito had been using foreign substances to gain an edge, he was wrong about the Twins' position in the American League Central. Even with the loss on Tuesday, they remain a half game ahead of the Kansas City Royals for fourth. If nothing else, Donaldson can take solace in that.

Adblock test (Why?)


White Sox's Lucas Giolito trades barbs with Twins' Josh Donaldson over sticky stuff quip - CBS Sports
Read More

Beavers Clinch Series Over UC Irvine - OSU Beavers

Next Game: UC Irvine 3/6/2022 | 1:05 PM Oregon State Live Stream Mar. 06 (Sun) / 1:05 PM   UC Irvine CORVALLIS, Ore...